Supreme Court decisions, oral arguments, judicial appointments, constitutional rulings, and legal analysis from America's highest court.
The Supreme Court declined to let the Postal Service enforce rules restricting mail-in ballots, denying the Justice Department's request to lift a preliminary injunction. Washington state officials celebrated the decision as a huge win for orderly elections, confirming that existing vote-by-mail procedures will proceed unchanged.
President Trump criticized the Supreme Court after justices rejected his efforts to overhaul mail-in ballot voting procedures. He called Justices Barrett, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh a "shell of their original selves" for siding with lower court injunctions blocking rules that would have required approved voter lists and secure barcoded envelopes.
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether the Trump administration can enforce new mail ballot requirements ahead of November midterms. A lower court previously blocked the rules, and experts warn implementation may be too late as ballots are already distributed.
The Supreme Court will decide whether to hear a Maine lobsterman's challenge to mandatory GPS boat trackers. The state required federally permitted lobstermen to install trackers in 2023 for U.S. data collection, a move conservation groups support for managing declining lobster populations amid Fourth Amendment concerns.
Newsweek argues that President Donald Trump faces buyer's remorse over his Supreme Court appointments after justices rejected his emergency request regarding 2026 midterm election ballot rules. The commentary contends this ruling exemplifies a broader pattern where conservative justices apply legal standards rather than political loyalty, undermining Trump's authority.
Newsweek explains that the Supreme Court blocked White House-backed Postal Service ballot requirements for the 2026 elections, leaving state-specific receipt deadlines in place. The article details how 35 states require ballots to arrive by Election Day, while others allow post-election processing, affecting voter eligibility.
The Supreme Court has rejected President Trump's executive order imposing restrictions on mail-in ballots. This ruling blocks the implementation of the order, marking another legal setback in the ongoing battle over federal voting procedures and election integrity policies.
William Vaillancourt argues that the Supreme Court correctly blocked Donald Trump's executive order on mail-in voting. He contends that Justices Alito and Thomas dissented based on fraud concerns, while the majority prioritized logistical feasibility before the election.
Richard L. Hasen argues that the Supreme Court's recent ruling preserving mail-in voting access for the 2026 midterms represents a critical victory against disenfranchisement efforts. He contends that while conservative justices risked ignoring mass voter suppression, the court's center ultimately prevented election subversion, warranting cautious celebration despite ongoing threats.
Former Trump attorney John Eastman has filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse his California disbarment. His legal team argues the case concerns whether government officials can strip a lawyer of their license for unpopular legal arguments related to the 2020 election.